A History of the True Hebrews (Documentary)

[Intro music playing] When Israel was a nation, they agreed to
a set of covenant laws at Mount Sinai as part of a special contract with Yah. It
meant that they were to be his people and he would in turn be their Elohim. Now,
as with all contracts, which usually involve at least two parties, in this
case Yah and Israel, both parties were bound by certain agreements which were
spelled out in the contract, or covenant. The ancient people of Israel were told
that if they obeyed the laws of the covenant, they would have Yah’s protection
and be showered with many blessings. If they disobeyed, they would receive
punishment and suffer many curses. Sadly, our ancestors chose the latter, and
following that fateful decision, the nation of Israel was thereafter thrust
into a series of events that eventually resulted in a time of trouble and
punishment whose ill effects are still felt to this very day. Before long, Ancient Israel experienced a
civil war and eventually split into two Kingdoms, with the tribe of Judah leading a two-tribe Kingdom to the south and ten tribes
forming a kingdom to the north. After a period of self-rule, the independence of
the Northern Kingdom was threatened by the Assyrians. We get that account in the
book of Second Kings. Hoshea son of Elah to rule over Israel in the twelfth
year of King Ahaz’s reign in Judah. He reigned in Samaria nine years. He did
what was evil in Yah’s sight, but not to the same extent as the kings of Israel who
ruled before him. King Shalmaneser of Assyria attacked King Hoshea, so Hoshea was forced
to pay heavy tribute to Assyria. But Hoshea stopped paying the annual tribute
and conspired against the king of Assyria by asking King So of Egypt
to help him shake free of Assyria’s power. When the king of Assyria discovered this
treachery, he seized Hoshea and put him in prison. Then the king of Assyria
invaded the entire land, and for three years he besieged the city of Samaria.
Finally, in the ninth year of King Hoshea’s reign, Samaria fell, and the people
of Israel were exiled to Assyria. They were settled in colonies in Halah, along
the banks of the Habor River in Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes. This disaster
came upon the people of Israel because they worshiped other deities. They sinned
against Yah their Elohim, who had brought them safely out of Egypt and had rescued
them from the power of Pharaoh, the king of Egypt. They had followed the
practices of the pagan nations Yah had driven from the land ahead of them, as
well as the practices the kings of Israel had introduced. This gives us a
good picture of why the Northern Kingdom punished by being exiled to Assyria,
but later, Judah, which was the only kingdom left, also ended up doing that
which was not right in the sight of Yah. Second Kings chapter 24 informs us that the
last independent king of Judah, Jehoiachin, reigned for eight years, practicing evil,
before Yah unleashed the forces of Babylon on the Kingdom of Judah, which
ended in that nation being led away captive as well. 70 long years of
captivity was experienced in Babylon, and the ancient Israelites witnessed the
fall of that empire and the rise of the next. After the 70 years had expired, the
new Persian king, Cyrus the Great, allowed the people of Judah to return to their
homeland and rebuild. This event was recorded in the Scriptures. In the first
year of King Cyrus of Persia, Yah fulfilled the prophecy he had given
through Jeremiah. He stirred the heart of Cyrus to put this proclamation in writing
and to send it throughout his kingdom: This is what King Cyrus of Persia says:
“Yah, the Elohim of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth. He has
appointed me to build him a Temple at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Any
of you who are his people may go to Jerusalem in Judah to rebuild this
Temple of Yah, the Elohim of Israel, who lives in Jerusalem. And may your
Elohim be with you! Wherever this Hebrew remnant is found, let their neighbors
contribute toward their expenses by giving them silver and gold, supplies for
the journey, and livestock, as well as a voluntary offering for the Temple of
Elohim in Jerusalem.” That second temple was indeed rebuilt, and it existed until
the time of Yeshua, who prophesied its ultimate destruction. Sadly, many of the
people of Judah rejected Yeshua, as they failed to understand the many prophesies
and types that pointed to him, such as those found in Exodus 12 verse 5,
Zechariah 13 verse 6, Genesis 49 verse 10, Isaiah 7 verse 14, Micah 5 verse 2, and
so many others. Yeshua highlighted their rejection of him in several parables.
A notable one is the parable of the evil farmers, which can be found in Matthew 21
verses 33 to 46, and in it Yeshua reveals what the rejection of the nation he was
sent to would result in. Following the fulfillment of the parable of the evil
farmers, wherein they murdered the son of the vineyard owner, that being Yeshua, and
after the rejection of his emissaries, the fate of Judah and Jerusalem was
pretty much sealed. Yeshua prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem
and pointed to the future of the people of Judah, which was right in line with
the curses of Deuteronomy 28. And when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies,
then you will know that the time of its destruction has arrived. Then those in
Judea must flee to the hills. Those in Jerusalem must get out, and those out in
the country should not return to the city. For those will be days of Elohim’s
vengeance, and the prophetic words of the Scriptures will be fulfilled.
How terrible it will be for pregnant women and for nursing mothers in those days.
For there will be disaster in the land and great anger against this people.
They will be killed by the sword or sent away as captives to all the nations of
the world. And Jerusalem will be trampled down by the Gentiles until the period of
the Gentiles comes to an end. This particular prophecy, as you can see,
stretched throughout time, with Jerusalem being controlled by the Romans who
were the first to march on her following Yeshua’s prediction. Roman rule lasted
for hundreds of years after the initial siege. Then the Romans eventually lost
hold of Jerusalem to the Muslims, and thereafter various Caliphates controlled
Jerusalem until the time of the Crusades. During this long period, Popes allied
with European Kings to fight against Muslims. The Crusades were first and
foremost an expression of Papal authority against the enemies of the
Church. The First Crusade was preached by a pope, Pope Urban II in France in the
year 1095. With reference to the muslims and in their advance in Europe and in
Jerusalem, I think the Christians in Europe believed that the Islamic message
of Muhammad was against and contradictory to what the Christians
were saying. They were worried that this idea could possibly overrun the
Christian idea. Pope Urban conceived this idea: “It’s not
a sin if you kill non-Christians, if you kill non-Believers in our faith.” And so,
he made this deal that if you go and fight in the Holy Land, you will be
forgiven all your past sins. A knight could sin as much as he liked, and simply
by going to the Holy Land, he had been given his passport to Heaven, and that
was an extremely attractive deal and combined with that he could win fame, he
could win glory, and he could come back with the treasures of the Near East.
These are the things that drew knights in their tens of thousands to go on
crusade. The bloodletting of the Crusaders spread throughout the Islamic
lands. Everybody heard stories about the massacre of unarmed individuals. It
created this intense rage amongst Muslims. In a sense, it resulted in a new
kind of Muslim crusade, a desire to raise an army to go back to liberate Jerusalem
from the Crusaders as an act of piety on the part of Muslims. I don’t think any of
those young men either Christian or Muslim could possibly have imagined that
their struggle could possibly still be playing itself out a thousand years
later in the area that we call the Middle East today. Following the Crusades, control of Jerusalem went from Mongol Warriors,
to Egyptian Mamalukes, to the Ottoman Empire, who surrendered
Jerusalem to the British on December 9, 1917. That event led to the modern-day
circumstance, which allowed for the establishment of an Israeli state, which
is currently occupied by Gentile posers pretending to be the people of Israel,
as stated in Revelation chapter 2 verse 9 and chapter 3 verse 9. As prophesied by
Yeshua, “Jerusalem would be trampled down by the Gentiles until the period of the
Gentiles comes to an end.” That means that Gentiles would be in Jerusalem, trampling
it down till the very last day, when Yeshua comes. In other words, the people
in that land calling themselves Israel, are really Gentiles. But let one of them
tell you himself. In his book, The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur
Koestler, himself a so-called Jew, writes in the very first chapter: About the
time when Charlemagne was crowned Emperor of the West, the eastern
confines of Europe between the Caucasus and the Volga were ruled by a
Jewish state, known as the Khazar Empire. At the peak of its power, from the seventh to
the tenth centuries AD, it played a significant part in shaping the
destinies of mediaeval, and consequently of modern, Europe. . . . The country of the
Khazars, a people of Turkish stock, occupied a strategic key position at the
vital gateway between the Black Sea and the Caspian, where the great eastern
powers of the period confronted each other. It acted as a buffer protecting
Byzantium against invasions by the lusty barbarian tribesmen of the northern
steppes. . . . But equally, or even more important both from the point of view of
Byzantine diplomacy and of European history, is the fact that the Khazar
armies effectively blocked the Arab avalanche in its most devastating early
stages, and thus prevented the Muslim conquest of Eastern Europe. . . .
It is perhaps not surprising, given these circumstances, that in 732 — after a
resounding Khazar victory over the Arabs — the future Emperor Constantine V married
a Khazar princess. In due time their son became the Emperor Leo IV, known
as Leo the Khazar. Ironically, the last battle in the war, AD 737, ended in a
Khazar defeat. But by that time the impetus of the Muslim Holy War was spent, the
Caliphate was rocked by internal dissensions, and the Arab invaders
retraced their steps across the Caucasus without having gained a permanent
foothold in the north, whereas the Khazars became more powerful than they had
previously been. A few years later, probably AD 740, the King, his court
and the military ruling class embraced the Jewish faith, and Judaism became the
state religion of the Khazars. No doubt their contemporaries were as astonished
by this decision as modern scholars were when they came across the evidence in
the Arab, Byzantine, Russian and Hebrew sources. . . . What is in dispute is the fate
of the Jewish Khazars after the destruction of their empire, in the twelfth
or thirteenth century. On this problem the sources are scant, but various late mediaeval Khazar
settlements are mentioned in the Crimea, in the Ukraine, in Hungary, Poland and
Lithuania. The general picture that emerges from these fragmentary pieces of
information is that of a migration of Khazar tribes and communities into those
regions of Eastern Europe — mainly Russia and Poland — where, at the dawn of the
Modern Age, the greatest concentrations of Jews were found. This has led several
historians to conjecture that a substantial part, and perhaps the
majority of eastern Jews — and hence of world Jewry — might be of Khazar, and not of
Semitic Origin. . . . The large majority of surviving Jews in the world is of
Eastern European — and thus perhaps mainly of Khazar — origin. If so, this would mean
that their ancestors came not from the Jordan but from the Volga, not
not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan
race; and that genetically they are more closely related to the Hun, Uyghur and
Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Tell me, what did you mean in the title of your book that the Jewish people had
been invented? It isn’t a provocation, I meant it, I think that the Jewish people
was invented like the French people, like the Italian people. You see to build
nations in the modern times, historians started to build to the past peoples and
between these peoples, I think that in the second half of the 19th century, the
Jewish people were invented. Shlomo Sand, an Israeli Emeritus Professor of History
at Tel Aviv University, wrote a book called The Invention of the Jewish
People, in which he agrees with a lot of what Arthur Koestler brought forth
concerning the Khazarian origins of the so-called Jews. Shlomo Sand, who is
himself a so-called Jew, points out that the ancestry of most contemporary Jews
stems mainly from outside the Land of Israel, and they are descended from
converts, and that mass conversions to Judaism occurred among the Khazars in the
Caucasus, Berber tribes in North Africa, and in the Himyarite Kingdom of the
Arabian Peninsula. Yeshua said that a certain people would say they are
Jews but are not, and those people are the Khazars and their descendants who are
among us today. And the fact that many sources can be found among these people
which proclaim their true origins is astounding. On page 226 of his book Sand
writes: Another early source attesting to the collective conversion of the
Khazars is a Karaite one. In about 973 CE, one Yaakov Qirqisani, a scholarly
traveler who was quite familiar with the regions around Khazaria, wrote a
commentary in Aramaic on the verse “Elohim shall enlarge Japheth” (Gen. 9:27): “This
is what the words mean: he will dwell in the tents of Shem, which grant him a
favor and advantage. And some commentators think that
this refers to the Khazars, who became Jews.” What is interesting
about the quote he cites and agrees with is the fact that they know and believe
the prophecy concerning a people who would pretend to be of the tribe of
Judah but are truly Gentiles. And they base this on Genesis 9 verse 27, which
coincides with Revelation 2 verse 9 and 3 verse 9. What’s more, most of the world
is buying into this deception, and for the present-day Khazarians, that’s
probably reason to celebrate. But getting back to Arthur Koestler on
this subject, he writes: The Jews of our times fall into two main divisions:
Sephardim and Ashkenazim. The Sephardim are descendants of the Jews
who since antiquity had lived in Spain until they were expelled at the end of
the fifteenth century and settled in the countries bordering on the Mediterranean,
the Balkans, and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. . . . In the 1960s, the number
of Sephardim was estimated at 500,000. The Ashkenazim, at the same period,
numbered about eleven million. Thus, in common parlance, Jew is
practically synonymous with Ashkenazi Jew. It should be mentioned that the
Ashkenaz of the Bible refers to a people living somewhere in the vicinity
of Mount Ararat and Armenia. The name occurs in Genesis 10:3 and
I Chronicles 1:6, as one of the sons of Gomer, who was a son of Japheth.
Ashkenaz is also a brother of Togarmah (and a nephew of Magog) whom the Khazars,
according to King Joseph, claimed as their ancestor. But worse was to come.
For Ashkenaz is also named in Jeremiah 51:27, where the prophet calls
his people and their allies to rise and destroy Babylon: “Call thee upon the
kingdoms of Ararat, Minni and Ashkenaz.” This passage was interpreted by the
famous Saadiah Gaon, spiritual leader of Oriental Jewry in the tenth century, as a
prophecy relating to his own times: Babylon symbolized the Caliphate of
Baghdad, and the Ashkenaz who were to attack it were either the Khazars
themselves or some allied tribe. So, as we have seen from the words of Arthur
Koestler, historically, the Khazars and their descendants do not identify with Shem . . . but, rather, they identify with Japheth, and that is proved out in their own
writings. This is a major fulfillment of Scripture. All that being said, what
happened to the real people of Judah in 70 A.D. following the siege and
destruction of Jerusalem. The ones who weren’t captured by the Romans and
killed or enslaved escaped, but where did they go? First, you have to understand
that whenever trouble arose, such as severe famine in the land, our forefathers
and mothers were known to migrate in order to avoid it. There are three famous
accounts of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob heading south when famine struck at
different periods in each of their lifetimes. Abraham and Jacob went all the
way south to Egypt, but Isaac went as far as Gerar. And let’s not forget Joseph
and Mary, who also fled south to Egypt with Yeshua to escape trouble. These
acts are all somewhat prophetic, as they are a major clue as to what happened to
the people of Judah following the destruction of Jerusalem. In his book
From Babylon to Timbuktu, author and historian Rudolph R. Windsor, a true Hebrew,
writes: In the year 65 B.C. the Roman armies under General Pompey captured
Jerusalem. In 70 A.D. General Vespasian and his son, Titus put an end to the Jewish
state with great slaughter. During the period of the military governors of
Palestine, many outrages and atrocities were committed against the residue of
the people. During the period from Pompey to Julius, it has been estimated that
over 1,000,000 Jews fled into Africa, fleeing from Roman persecution and slavery.
The slave markets were full of black Jewish slaves. After the fall of
the Carthaginian metropolis in North Africa, Roman power became dominant in
the Barbery States. . . . The pagans and the Romans attacked the Jews indiscriminately,
both the Jewish soldiers and the uninvolved peaceful population. . . . As a
result of this merciless attack, many Jews fled to those parts of northwest
Africa known as Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, and Mauretania. Many other Jews fled to
the areas where Rome did not have any jurisdiction, this was to the region of
the south, the Sahara Desert and the Sudan. Windsor also tells us on pages 86
and 87 that more descendants of Judah fled to the west coast of Africa in the
seventh century after the Visigoths assumed power and began to suppress Hebrew
customs with forced baptisms to Christianity. Windsor cites many credible
sources to make his points, among them is Joseph J. Williams, a twentieth century
historian who, in his 1930 book Hebrewisms of West Africa, wrote: “Whatever
may be thought of the more or less mythological traditions connected with
the earliest Jews in North Africa, it is now practically an established fact that
a Jewish nation — Jewish at least in faith, and perhaps too in origin — long held sway
south of the Sahara.” Now while Joseph Williams, who is
Caucasian and Jesuit, does provide meaningful and factual info that
pertains to the descendants of the ancient Hebrew Israelites, he does so with
a degree of reluctance, and the book is written through the lens of what I would
call a racist and white supremacist viewpoint. Because, despite all the
evidence of the true descendants of Judah and Israel as a whole being black,
Williams and his sources try to brush that aside and conclude that white Jews,
who they blindly claim are the originals, must have somehow lost their color by
interbreeding with blacks who thereafter assimilated their culture, for which
there is absolutely no evidence. That said, Hebrewisms of West Africa is full
of valuable information as regards the wanderings of the Hebrews following the
flight from Judea, and it also gives great insight into the further
scattering of our ancestors, as certain customs practiced in West Africa by our
Hebrew ancestors found their way to islands like Jamaica, Haiti, the Virgin
Islands, and many other places following the slave trade. So, having fled
their homeland as prophesied, there our ancestors were,
charting new territory in Africa and trying to carry on their Hebrew
traditions in a new land. But not as savages, or uncivilized barbarians.
In fact, Rudolph Windsor tells us in his book: The black Jews had an advantage over the
African tribes: they carried their culture, history, laws, and written records
with them; this assured them a constant precedent for the development of a
higher social organization. Because of the stability of the black Jewish culture,
the Jews were not absorbed into the autochthonous, or native, population.
In fact, the Jews absorbed some of the native tribes. The Jews made use of every
opportunity; they were an industrious and skillful people: In the Jewish Ghanaian
states were found kings, princes, governors, generals, secretaries,
treasurers, revenue agents, judges, architects, engineers, doctors, jewelers,
sculptors, masons, carpenters, painters of art, goldsmiths, leather-workers,
potters, armorers, saddlers, blacksmiths, agriculturists, etc.
The survivors of the Roman siege of Jerusalem were able to flee that terror
and carry on in a new land. But the relative peace our ancestors were
afforded by escaping to Africa was broken by the Arab Slave Trade, which
affected not only Hebrews, but men, women, and children from many other peoples that
were usually of the lowest classes. The eastern Arab slave trade, in particular
involved women and young girls, and a strict ratio of two women for each man
was maintained. The Arab Slave Trade, as horrible as it was, eventually gave way
to something much worse with the arrival of the Portuguese. Portugal broke
from Arab rule somewhere between the 12th and 13th centuries and
slowly rose to power. Because of this small European country, slavery would
soon go from including people of lower classes from different ethnicities, to
being forced mainly on so-called blacks, from the tribe of Judah. In the early
fifteenth century, Portuguese shipbuilding in Lisbon and Porto adapted to the times
and the result was the caravel, a light and fast aerodynamic vessel that allowed
Portuguese mariners to travel south along Africa’s Atlantic coast in order
to reach the gold-producing regions of sub-Saharan West Africa. After
establishing several trading posts and colonies in the region, other markets
began to open up, such as the lucrative commerce in India, and overseas expansion
resulted from Portugal’s many trade networks. The Portuguese became heavily
active in slave trading in Africa around 1445, after they discovered the Cape
Verde islands and settled there. Slavery was used to fuel their expanding
empire, and slave trafficking became integral to their enterprise. When it
became apparent that slavery was big business, a law had to be created to
protect it, thus, the sitting Pope, Pope Nicholas the Fifth, issued a papal bull, the
strongest command of a pope, titled Romanus Pontifex, Latin for the Roman
Pontiff. He issued the bull to King Alfonso the Fifth of Portugal on January 8,
1455, and it allowed the king to [and I quote] “. . . invade, search out, capture, vanquish,
and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ
wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions,
possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and
possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery.”
This was basically a license and go- ahead for King Alfonso, who alone was
personally named in the papal bull, to send vessels to search out, capture,
vanquish, subdue, and enslave Hebrews, particularly the people of Judah, whose
existence, kingdom, and territory they were well aware of. The people of Judah
were their primary concern in fact, and they are the so-called Negroes who were
rounded up and scattered throughout the four corners of the earth, just as Yeshua
said they would be, back in Luke 21 verse 24. They will be killed by the
sword or sent away as captives to all the nations of the world. . . . And this also
coincides with the curse of Deuteronomy 28 verse 64: For Yah will scatter you among
all the nations from one end of the earth to the other. When I say they were
aware of who Judah was, I’m not conjecturing. Proof is in the record.
If you do a Google search and type in A New and Accurate Map of Negroland,
a list of results will pop up. As of the date of this recording, Swaen.com
still works. Click on it and a page will open up showing a 1747 map of West
Africa, by eighteenth-century English map engraver Emmanuel Bowen,
and then click on the image of the map itself. Move your mouse
pointer to the area that is now present-day Ghana and click on it to
enlarge the map. Click it again, and you’ll clearly see that what is now
called Ghana was once the Slave Coast, which the mapmaker labeled, The Kingdom
of Juda, dropping the “H” at the end. This is where many of the people of Judah
were shipped from, like sardines in a can. Yet today, the elites and their paid
professors would have you believe that we are Africans or Hamites, when in
truth, we are Shemites. They themselves know this to be a fact. In Zondervan’s
Compact Bible Dictionary for instance, the definition for Ham reads as follows:
Ham — The youngest son of Noah, born probably about 96 years before the Flood;
and one of eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the
dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and
Canaanites. They say not the Negroes because Shem is the progenitor or father
of the Negroes. Though both lines are comprised of so-called blacks, Africans
and so-called African-Americans are not the same. We are Hebrews and they are
Hamites. But there are still many Hebrews in Africa, however. But getting back to
our history, despite the papal bull pertaining solely to the king of
Portugal, that didn’t stop other empires and nations from
getting in on the action. Over the centuries, Spain, Britain, France,
the Dutch, Canada, the United States, and many African countries participated in a
transatlantic slave trade and this fulfilled certain prophecies, such as
Psalm 83, which I urge you to read with your eyes open, and Joel 3 verse 6:
You have sold the people of Judah and Jerusalem to the Greeks, so they could
take them far from their homeland. The sad fact is, Psalm 83 is
still in full effect, as our collective enemies are still
conspiring to keep us in the dark as concerns our true identity, and they
continue to miseducate to us. They really mean to wipe out the memory of the
true people of Israel from the face of the earth, but Yah is not going to let that
happen. And this documentary is merely one step toward that effort. The present
situation we are in is solely due to our forefathers failing to keep the covenant
law of Yah, and it falls to us in this generation to right that wrong, and
Yah said that this would happen in our day: ” ‘But I will spare some, for some
of you will escape the sword when you are scattered among the
lands and nations. Then in the nations where they have been carried
captive, those who escape will remember me — how I have been grieved by their
adulterous hearts, which have turned away from me, and by their eyes, which have
lusted after their idols. They will loathe themselves for the evil they have
done and for all their detestable practices. And they will know that I am
Yah; I did not threaten in vain to bring this calamity on them.’ ” You see,
we, the people of Israel are not born deserving of that name. We are born
as Jacobs, or supplanters and schemers, but to truly earn the right to be called
Israel, we, like our father Jacob will have to be faithful and wrestle with
Yah until we are overcomers. Those of us who do this will be the ones who will
truly be called Israel and form the remnant of the Kingdom. Having said that,
please don’t let this be the end of your search for truth on this subject.
Continue to dig for it and pray that Yah gives you discernment since a great deal
of deception is out there regarding this topic. And spread the word to your
friends and family, and he or she that has ears to hear and eyes to see among
them will get it. I hope that this brief history has enlightened you and brought
a degree of understanding as concerns our past, which goes well beyond Africa.
The so-called Negros, blacks, and African Americans are actually the
descendants of the people of Judah, and that is something they
don’t want us to know. [Closed Captioning by Kingdom Preppers]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *